Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





June 26, 2004

It's the End of the Quarter.... you know what that means!!

By Byron LaMasters

It's June 26th, and the end of the quarter is four days away, so I decided to make my end of the quarter donations tonight. I'm a student, working part-time this summer, so I figured I could spend a little bit of money giving to candidates that I support. I'd encourage all of you to donate to the candidates of your choice at the end of the quarter (so within the next four days). End of the quarter reports can make a second tier candidate a first tier candidate. They can make seemingly uncompetetive candidates viable. Small contributions can make a difference, especially when they're bundled. That's why I decided to donate money to Kerry (which has become a monthly thing) as well as three of the dKos 8 candidates. I didn't contribute to the three top congressional races across the country, but I contributed to three races where my $10 contribution bundled with hundreds of others could make a difference.

  • John Kerry - $25.00. He's the next president of the United States. He needs our money to fend off hysterical attacks like the latest Bush WebAd comparing Kerry's attacks to Adolf Hitler. It's outrageous and it's one of the main reasons that inspired me to contribute to John Kerry again today. Anyway, I still think that Kerry is running a great campaign, and he deserves our support.
  • Richard Morrison - $10.01. Sure, it may be a longshot. We probably won't beat Tom DeLay. But it's important to send Tom DeLay a message that we don't like what he's doing. Tom DeLay is responsible for making the U.S. Congress the most partisan and uncivil Congress in recent history. At the very least, he needs a serious challenge, so that he'll at least have to watch his back.
  • Stan Matsunaka - $10.01. He's running against Congress's number one hater - Marylin Musgrave. She's the sponsor of the Federal Marriage Amendment, and is obsessed with gay people. All she seems to care about it denying rights to gays and lesbians. She doesn't give a flip about her district. She's a one-issue congresswoman and she's out of touch. Her district deserves better. She won in the 2002 GOP landslide in Colorado, but Stan Matsunaka saw that she was looking vulnerable in the polls and decided to take a second shot at the race. He deserves our support.
  • Jim Stork - $10.01. Jim Stork is running against Clay Shaw in a district that Al Gore carried in 2000. Democrats nearly won the district in 2000, but recount technicalities kept it in GOP hands. This coastal Flordia district is Democratic, and ought to have a Democratic congressman. Jim Stork has experience as a small business owner and as a mayor. Stork is also openly gay, so his election would mean that we'd have four openly gay members of congress (out of 535, house + senate). Of course, Florida already has a gay member of congress, Mark Foley, but he refuses to discuss his sexual orientation. It would be nice for Florida to have an openly gay Congressman.

There's other great candidates to consider as well. Stan Matsunaka is one of the candidates advertising on BOR, but there are others advertising here as well that are worthy of your support:

  • Betty Castor for U.S. Senate in Florida - She's one of the three Democrats running for Bob Graham's seat. She's been leading in many of the recent polls. The Democratic primary is in September.
  • Lorenzo Sadun for U.S. Congress - Lorenzo is who I'll be writing in for Congress this November. I live in his district, and he's my candidate. He's a UT professor and he's been making his rounds in the district. Help him make a serious campaign this November.
  • Tom Daschle - for U.S. Senate - Do I need to say anything more? Tom Daschle is the most endangered Senate Democratic incumbent this cycle. John Thune is running again, and Republicans would like nothing more than to take out our Senate leader. Tom Daschle needs our support.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at June 26, 2004 01:03 AM | TrackBack

Comments

Err, as far as I can tell, the Hitler stuff was pulled from one of the ads that was submitted to MoveOn back when they did "Bush in 30 seconds". The BushCo video was produced as "red meat" for the dittoheads as a compilation of Democrats being "insane."

This is the latest Bush meme - that Kerry, and his supporters, are mentally deranged.

Frankly, Bush's surrogates did have a legitimate case in decrying the unused MoveOn submissions -- but if they were acting in good faith (do they ever?) they would have put it aside instead of recycling this stuff to score points on "crazy" Democrats.

This is really about hypocrisy, pettiness, and a willingness for the Republicans to attack strawmen instead of focus on their "record" (can you blame them?).

The Hitler stuff is the rhetorical equivalent of "look! it's Halley's comet!"

Posted by: Jim D at June 26, 2004 01:38 AM

Hey, don't spend so much! You still gotta buy Clinton's book. It's kickass. Oh by the way did anybody get to read Bill Clinton's online diary? You just gotta love the guy.

Posted by: TXLump at June 26, 2004 01:46 PM

This may not post, but I'll try anyway:

Frankly, Bush's surrogates did have a legitimate case in decrying the unused MoveOn submissions

I disagree. The MoveOn contest was open to anyone, including both overzealous lefties and GOP dirty tricksters.

<tinfoil hat>

I wouldn't be surprised if Karl Rove himself created a front group to create an over-the-top ad comparing Bush to Hitler and submit it to MoveOn's contest, with the express intent of doing what they did: using it as a club to bash MoveOn with later on.

Admittedly, I have zero evidence for my conspiracy theory. But I wouldn't put it past Rove, and it would let the Bush campaign get away with using a clip from the ad without worrying about copyright issues.

</tinfoil hat>

On the other hand, Bush's use of the clip is probably "fair use" under copyright law anyway, and the overzealous leftie explanation is equally plausible. (And in any case, there was a second Nazi ad.) But the only way MoveOn could be legitimately blamed for posting it would be if they were pre-screening (i.e., censoring) the submissions before putting them up for their members to vote on.

I don't think MoveOn should be criticized for putting their faith in their membership to reject over-the-top contest submissions, instead of pre-censoring them. That may be the GOP way of doing things, but it isn't the right way, and we should never let the GOP badger us into apologizing for doing the right thing.

Posted by: Mathwiz at June 29, 2004 10:19 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








March 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15