Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
February 17, 2004Exit Polls? bah!!By Karl-Thomas MusselmanI understand that we are all rushing to find out what happened as soon as possible in elections. I find it disturbing enough that the media this eleciton cycle can't even go a couple hours into voting without releasing exit polls. But you know it's bad when they start to bypass polling and simply predict the future and publish it before events have actually happened. As a sidenote, what percentage of the Punx for Dean group do you think will be swayed to vote for John Kerry? Methinks not to many. Would someone please remind me again where and how Kerry is going to be broadening the base of our party in the long run? Posted by Karl-Thomas Musselman at February 17, 2004 03:45 PM | TrackBackComments
If Dean supporters don't end up supporting the Democratic candidate for president... Remind me again where and how Dean has broadened the base of our party? Posted by: Harold at February 17, 2004 03:49 PMThat doesn't answer the question. Posted by: Karl-T at February 17, 2004 03:53 PMKarl-Thomas... it's the information age and it's inevitable that exit polls will be leaked and published in the age of the Internet, blogs and other non-traditional news sources. I think it's entirely inappropriate for mainstream / network media to publish exit polls before the polls close, because that's where the average voter will get their news from and I think that major media corporations have a responsibility to their viewers to present a fair view of the race on election day by not calling anything until the polls close. As for alternative media, however, I see one of the major purposes of blogs is to report on things that the mainstream media either ignores and/or doesn't report. If I thought that my posting on exit polls would influence anyone to not vote today, I wouldn't post them, but I don't think that the people that read blogs regularly and really keep up with blogs / internet stuff would be influenced by exit polls. The people who get influenced by that kind of stuff, in my opinion are casual observers who may or may not vote, probably aren't plugged in to the internet community and aren't very well aligned with one candidate or another. Posted by: Byron L at February 17, 2004 04:09 PMA good response Byron. Just so long as the general media doesn't start going earlier to get ahead of what they perceive to be a threat from the online world. Many of the TV/Newspapers also exist online now so it's not that hard of a jump to make. That's what worries me. Posted by: Karl-T at February 17, 2004 04:16 PMIt's obvious that Dean is preparing an independent candidacy. That's the only explanation for his bullheaded refusal to bow out. And that's why his national chairman, a former Democratic Party apparatchik, has jumped ship - in protest. Toss Nader into the mix again, and Kerry will be lucky to draw 35% of the popular vote, with a possible zero in the electoral college. Posted by: Mark Harden at February 17, 2004 04:58 PMMark, That's just dilusional. We're really not that stupid. The Democratic Party is more united now than it has been at any time in recent history in its desire to oust a Republican president. Howard Dean has repeated said that he will support the Democratic nominee. He'll drop out, and support the nominee on his timetable. While I'm no longer a Dean supporter, I think that he has every right to keep going at least until John Kerry has secured the necessary delegates to win the nomination. While I'd advise him to end his campaign earlier than that, I won't call for Dean to pull out officially until Kerry has secured the delegates to become the presumptive nominee. Posted by: Byron L at February 17, 2004 05:14 PMI keep hoping the media will pull a Chicago Sun-Times and post one of these stories which is then "overtaken by events." But it's not likely that all the polls would be that far off. It's pretty clear that CBS channel 47 had already decided what they were going to say about today's primary even before it happened. Even if Dean were to defy all expectations and end up within 5% of Kerry, they'd still spin it as "another blow to Dean" since he didn't win outright. BTW, NH and TN midday exit polls were rather far off. Kerry's going to win, but I'm still hopeful Dean's numbers will be better than what Drudge is posting.... It's been obvious for some time that Dean doesn't have a snowball's chance in a Texas July of winning the nomination. But that doesn't make the media's undisguised gloating over it any easier to take. Posted by: Mathwiz at February 17, 2004 05:16 PMTwo points: • What ever happened to the agreement among news organizations after the 1980 election not to publish exit poll results or to call an election in a particular state until all the polls are closed there? And can anybody complain about Channel 47's lapse when exit poll results are published on certain political blogs well before all the polls are closed? I'm with Tim Z. It's crunch time; Kerry may not be everyone's ideal, a lot of us want a more progressive candidate, but he's our best shot. I'm not ashamed of going for "electability". Bush has to go, and everyone of us has to do what it takes to get that done. Posted by: alamoboy at February 18, 2004 01:04 PMPost a comment
|
|