Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





February 12, 2004

SF Gives Marriage License to Lesbian Couple

By Byron LaMasters

As the Massachusetts conventions drags on through day two after two compromise amendments failed yesterday, the city of San Francisco has decided to issue marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples in a challenge to California law:

History was made at 11:06 a.m. today at San Francisco City Hall when Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon took their wedding vows, becoming the first same-sex couple to be officially married in the United States.

Mabel Teng, the city's assessor-recorder, officiated over the ceremony, inserting the phrase "spouse for life'' in place of "husband'' and "wife.''

"This is a very significant day for Del and Phyllis and for all of us witnessing this historic ceremony,'' Teng said before the couple recited their vows.

About 20 people witnessed the ceremony; many of them were moved to tears as the couple, who have been together for five decades, were wed.

The wedding came just two days after Mayor Gavin Newsom announced that he wanted San Francisco to take the lead in bestowing the same marriage rights to gays and lesbians as are awarded to straight couples, saying he is duty-bound to fight discrimination.

The landmark wedding, the first of many expected to be held at City Hall today, is sure to set off a legal challenge. City officials, in fact, rushed to issue the first marriage licenses to same-sex couples as quickly as possible for fear that opponents would seek a court injunction to stop them. Officials alerted only a handful of people that they were ready to act, wanting to keep it secret until the papers were signed and the "I do's'' were spoken.

The decision was made late Wednesday night, and the clerk's office spent this morning amending the marriage license documents to reflect the change.

In place of "bride'' and "groom'' on the application were the words "1st applicant'' and "2nd applicant.''

After Martin, 83, and the 79-year-old Lyon were declared spouses for life, three other couples were lined up, awaiting their turn to take marriage vows.

Lyon, who will celebrate her 51st anniversary with Martin on Saturday, Valentine's Day, got a call Wednesday from Kate Kendell, executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights, asking her if she'd be willing to take the plunge.


It's funny how Gavin Newsome was attacked by liberals and Greens as a conservative in San Francisco's recent mayoral election where Newsome narrowly defeated Green Matt Gonzalez. It's amazing how quickly the gay marriage is exploding into the public debate. You bet it'll be an election issue and Democrats will have an interesting balancing act to do.

Update: The picture seen on Daily Kos is in my next post, here.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at February 12, 2004 02:32 PM | TrackBack

Comments

Wow. Very much a pushing of the envelope.

Even supporters of gay marriage should realize that the marriage is void/voidable because it is not recognized by statute. However, who will have standing to challenge the marriage? Likely it will be when "something happens," e.g. one dies and the family wants to inherit over the spouse, etc.

In any event, it will stir things up in Cali and beyond.

Posted by: WhoMe? at February 12, 2004 07:35 PM

I caught your post at Kos and nearly had a heart attack for excitement. I credited you over at my own blog (see url) when I reported it. Thanks for getting to it so quickly.

Posted by: Incertus at February 13, 2004 03:38 AM

Ow brother, well we have all at one time or another made fun of the word "marriage" but this is the ultimate. I had CNN on today and after Mr.Bush made his short and to the point valid speach, we were introduced to two middle aged queers, (sorry I call it the way it is because of the ideals of this type of behaviour is queer(unusual, or abnormal) smooching on TV. Well I just about tossed more than my salad. Hell, since we are degrading the idea of marriage, what is next? I can see it, in 2010 allowances for marrying our favorite pets. We are on the way, since both fall under the title "abomination" and the link above describes the actual meaning of this word, as homosexuality. To be blunt when I hear this word, I think of "Aids", which is the only contribution of this sickly act altogether. The sad thing is some of these "queer" people are quite nice, and polite, but I don't understand why they do not carry this behavior on, to the bedroom. Sorry folks, but man and woman have two different parts that make things happen.. "babies". The other way is like trying to put the square block into a triangle mould. Suggestion? ... a lot of consuling for these sad cases, because they need help not pity, or publicity.
Ow brother, now there is a group of males (I think) that are singing "going to the chapel" on MSN... hummm yes as I said, they are making fun of something that has been normal between man and woman only for centuries. Time to put a end to that nonsense people.

Good day all!

Posted by: Ken at February 24, 2004 07:10 PM

A straight woman said recently that "the only threat to heterosexual marriage are heterosexuals, who get married to a total stranger on television for money, who make lifetime vows of committment and divorce more than half the time". I have to agree. This kind of behavior among straights just makes a complete joke out of something we claim to hold sacred. But more than that, there is a simple matter of this country's constitution and bill of rights, which proclaim equality under the law FOR ALL, PERIOD. For the laws of any society to be valid they must be logically consistant in the way they're applied. We cannot arbitrarily grant rights to some people and withhold it from others, all the while saying we are about personl rights and freedoms without being a nation of hypocrits. And beleive me, the rest of the world does notice this. Remember, what makes this country great is not that we all think,feel,believe the same. It's that we can be very different and yet still live in the knowledge that the same laws and rights are applied to all of us without distinction. That is the whole point, the reason for AMERICA. What goes on in each of our own minds is just that. But the civil laws of the country MUST be above all that. And blind to any personal attribute that we imperfect mortals take such pleasure in condemming in each other.

of course I could be wrong.

Posted by: Darren at August 1, 2004 02:34 PM

Oh, one last thing. If the only reason for marriage is 'making babies', than all heterosexual unions that have not produced a child within a specified period of time should be rendered null and void for failure to meet any of the goals for which the union was created. Guess my infertal sister in law is no longer my brothers wife. Guess my step father, step mother, and step grandmother and, concequently, all their reletives are no longer part of my family then. Well, it was good to know them.

Posted by: Darren at August 1, 2004 02:53 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








May 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15