Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
November 05, 2003Why Barbour is Bad for BushBy Andrew DobbsSo let’s talk about what I think ought to be one of the biggest campaign issues against Bush next year. We have the war and his other foreign policy issues which have cost American lives and lessened the credibility of America in the world. We have the economy, which might be picking up but nonetheless has hemorrhaged 2.6 million jobs. But what is our social wedge going to be? How about racism. Last night, former Big Tobacco lobbyist and Gingrich-era RNC chair Haley Barbour was elected governor of Mississippi. Earlier in the campaign, Barbour was in a prominently placed picture on the website for well-known hate group the Council of Conservative Citizens. It sounds like just another GOP operation, but this group goes quite a bit further out there. On their main page, just below Barbour’s picture is a link to an article entitled “In Defense of Racism” which talks about how God made some races inferior, they have an ad supporting one Ernst Zundel about whom the Anti-Defamation League says: Since the late 1970s, Ernst Zundel has run Samisdat Publishers, one of the largest distributors of Nazi and neo-Nazi propaganda and memorabilia in the world. He is also the inspiration for and key content provider of www.zundelsite.org, since 1995 a leading online repository of Holocaust-denial propaganda. His activities have led to numerous trials in Canada and made him subject to probable arrest should he ever attempt to return to Germany. They sell a C of CCs pamphlet with this description: The Sixth Law of God is a book that will stun even fundamentalist Christians! Pastor V. S. Harrell has researched the oldest available Greek Septuagint texts to prove that the Commandment against adultery is a law against race mixing! Read this book and believe! They have an article by an author named simply “Angry White Female” entitled “Walking While White” which says that minorities rape white women because they hate white people. Furthermore, the ADL weighs in on the C of CCs by saying: The St. Louis-based Council of Conservative Citizens traces its roots directly to the racist, anti-integrationist White Citizens' Councils of the 1950s and 1960s. Its current leader, attorney Gordon Lee Baum, was an organizer for the WCC and built the Council of Conservative Citizens in part from the old group's mailing lists… Like its predecessor, the CCC inflames fears and resentments, particularly among Southern whites, with regard to black-on-white crime, nonwhite immigration, attacks on the Confederate flag and other issues related to "traditional" Southern culture. Although its leadership claims that the group is not racist, its publications, Web sites and actions all promote the purportedly innate superiority of white people and bias against nonwhites. So this group is a nasty white supremacist organization, the GOP candidate for governor was pictured on their website, at an event they hosted. He was asked if he wanted his picture and name removed from their site, and he declined. Essentially, he attended their events, he was supported by the same group that produced the murderer of Medgar Evers and when asked if he wanted to distance himself from them he declined. Furthermore, on Election Day the New York Times reported that: Racial issues flared… Election Day brought claims of intimidation at largely black precincts. Haley Barbour is affiliated with hate groups, he worked to intimidate black voters, he is a racist. George W. Bush made a high-profile campaign appearance, Dick Cheney appeared at at lest one Barbour fundraiser, the entire GOP establishment stood behind their ol’ boy- Haley Barbour. This should be a HUGE Democrat campaign issue next year. MTV, BET, UPN, every hip hop, R&B, Soul or Gospel station, every black magazine and every billboard and bus stop in black neighborhoods, everywhere young people spend time should have the message “George W. Bush spent time and money working to get a racist elected in Mississippi. George W. Bush stood by a man who is associated with a group that says that Martin Luther King was a traitor and that his holiday should not exist. Dick Cheney raised money for a man that scared elderly black men and women away from the polls. Thought Jim Crow went away in the 60s? Think Again.” If we can put Bush on the defense on this issue it could be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. Not only will it spur higher black turnout, it’ll mean less support from moderate whites and independents in the northern suburbs and more educated households- two of the largest constituencies out there. George Bush chose to support a man who stands with those who have supported lynching, who represent the worst parts of our country and it is time the country knew about it so they could do something about it.
Comments
It might be a bit hypocritical for a party which fields Al Sharpton as a legitimate presidential candidate to try to make any sort of tenuous connection from white racists to Barbour to Bush. Unless Barbour directly incited the murder of a half dozen or so Korean grocers and I missed it. Posted by: Mark Harden at November 5, 2003 07:26 AM"... for a party which fields Al Sharpton as a legitimate presidential candidate." I'm sorry, Al Sharpton was elected Governor of which state again? Posted by: Greg Wythe at November 5, 2003 12:24 PMFirst, Sharpton is an idiot. He's horrible for this country and for race relations. I agree that I would like see a condemnation for his roles in divisive and fraudulent incidents. Second, the Democratic party didn't seek him out. If anything, they want him to go away. I'll stand corrected if real party leaders are endorsing this guy and raising money for him. Third, "tenuous," Mark? Jeez. Let's deny some facts. Both parties have idiots and bigots. But this is the former head of the RNC. And this is the president who went to Bob Jones University and the "apologized" for going there. Posted by: Tx Bubba at November 5, 2003 03:33 PMSome might find it hypocritical to criticize Barbour's racist connections while defending Howard Dean's zeal to seek association with a flag that many African Americans in the south passionately believe is a symbol of racism. Posted by: Eduardo J. Klein at November 5, 2003 03:43 PMMississippi & racism. It's nice to now that some things never change. Posted by: Name at November 5, 2003 05:15 PMIt was interesting to see Barbour on TV making his victory speech. Every face on the podium behind him was black, and he spent a lot of time thanking the African American voters that he claimed supported him in record numbers (no idea whether there's any truth to that). One way or another, there was an obvious effort to blunt the charges of racist links (not altogether surprising in a state that's almost 40% Black). Posted by: JohnL at November 5, 2003 09:42 PMHoward Dean was 100% correct to say what he said. He has been saying it in his stump speech probably an average of 3 times a day, every day for over a year now if I had to guess and the Dems just now bring it up? Signs of desperation, grasping at anything. Dean was using a figure of speech, and since you almost never see the entire quote in all its context, here we go: Let me tell you something else I'm going to do. One of the things I thought was terrific about Bill Clinton was that when he became President in 1992, he said that his Cabinet would look like the rest of America -- and he did it. He did it. I want all of our institutions of higher learning, - our law schools, our medical schools, our best universities - to look like the rest of America. I thought that one of the most despicable moments of this President's Administration was three weeks ago when, on national prime time television, he used the word "quotas" seven times. The University of Michigan does not now have quotas, has never had quotas, and "quota" is a race-loaded word designed to appeal people's fears of losing their jobs. I intend to talk about race during this election in the South. The Republicans have been talking about it since 1968 in order to divide us, and I'm going to bring us together. Because you know what? White folks in the South who drive pick-up trucks with Confederate flag decals on the back ought to be voting with us because their kids don't have health insurance either, and their kids need better schools too. Horrifically racist isn't it? You are full of shit Eduardo. He was using this statement to say something against racism- the GOP and old school Dems have used racism and the "Lost Cause" as a means of dividing poor whites and poor blacks so that corrupt politicians and rich folks make out like bandits for over a century now. Its time someone had the stones to stand up and say that those who've been duped into voting for the GOP for all the wrong reasons are going to be brought back to the party that best represents their interests. The only thing Dean did wrong was to apologize for his remarks. All of the anti-Southern, elitist fuckoffs who fell in with John Kerry or Joe Lieberman or some other hopelessly out of touch surefire loser and are wishing they'd had the guts to go out on a limb and vote their hopes and not their fears are trying like hell to kill off the Democrats' best hope so that they don't look like a frontrunning asshole. They can all go to hell, Howard Dean is the first candidate in a long time to be saying these things and its about damn time. Posted by: Andrew D at November 6, 2003 01:25 AMGovernor Barbour has to have gotten a good portion of the black vote so the racist comments are suspect. On Howard Dean,if this is the man of the left for president, Bush can go ahead and redecorate the White House for the next term. Posted by: TomZ at November 10, 2003 04:02 PMPost a comment
|
|