Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





October 22, 2003

Justice Dept. Lawyer Reviewing Texas Map may be member of Bush's 2000 Recount Team in FL

By Byron LaMasters

Yeah, we can trust John Ashcroft's department to fairly review the new GOP map. Two lawyers in the department have already recused themselves, and the next lawyer in line to review the map was a member of the 2000 Bush Florida recount team. I'm sure that he's not biased. The Dallas Morning News reports:

Two top Justice Department lawyers have recused themselves from the pre-clearance review of Texas' new congressional districts, spokesman Jorge Martinez said Tuesday.

Mr. Martinez declined to explain any real or potential conflicts of interest that would force such a move. He did not cite a policy or law that bars explanation.

The officials are R. Alexander Acosta, the first Hispanic to lead the Civil Rights Division, and the division's No. 2 lawyer, J. Michael Wiggins. The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund honored Mr. Acosta in June for his role in implementing a Clinton-era executive order to help people with limited English skills get access to federal programs; MALDEF is one of the groups challenging the Texas redistricting plan.

A lawyer for Democrats in the redistricting cases, Gerald Hebert, said he's concerned that the next lawyer in line to review the legality of the Texas plan was on the GOP's presidential recount team in Florida. "Frankly, I think the whole Justice Department should be disqualified," Mr. Hebert said, and the matter left in the hand of federal judges.


Not that the Supreme Court isn't biased (Bush v. Gore), but at least we've got a fighting chance with them when the map gets there.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at October 22, 2003 12:50 PM | TrackBack

Comments

I DEMAND A RECOUNT!

Posted by: Jim D at October 22, 2003 01:51 PM

Byron,

FYI, that link doesn't go to the Dallas Morning News, but to the Mississippi article on Barbour.

Sherk

Posted by: Sherk at October 22, 2003 04:05 PM

Whoops, my bad Sherk.

I fixed the link. I was writing both the Barbour story and the DOJ at the same time and I must have clicked CTRL-C (copy) on the wrong link when I was inserting them. I was just in the UT computer lab on my lunch break so I didn't have a chance to edit it.

Thanks.

Posted by: ByronUT at October 22, 2003 04:18 PM

Not that the Supreme Court isn't biased (Bush v. Gore)

Would that not be the same "biased" Supreme Court which this year ruled in favor of affirmative action and struck down the Texas anti-sodomy law?

Posted by: Mark Harden at October 23, 2003 09:48 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








March 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15