Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
August 27, 2003This is what Constituent Service Looks LikeBy Byron LaMastersMuch of redistricting has been a partisan battle between Democrats and Republicans. Democrats talk about precedent, minority voting rights, and argue that the current district lines which favor Republicans in 20 out of 32 seats are more than fair. Republicans on the other hand argue that they're the majority and their is nothing inapropriate about trying to expand their majority through mid-decade redistricting so that they can better advance their Bush/Republican agenda in Congress. Those have been the battle lines. But Republicans often forget that it's about more than that. If Republicans get their way, they win and Democrats lose. Fine. But constituent service loses, too. Yesterday, I wrote about the Ratliff Republicans who generally lean conservative, but care more about rural issues such as timber and water than they care about the party affilation of their congressman. The letter from our Congressman Lloyd Doggett in today's Daily Texan welcoming Longhorns (back) to campus is what constituent service is all about. Doggett is a liberal Democrat. I know it, I admit it. But find me one thing in this letter that is about advancing a liberal Democratic agenda. If Republicans get their way in redistricting, we lose this type of constituent service. Regardless of your political affiliation, Lloyd Doggett is a powerful voice for students at the University of Texas. If students have a concern about financial aid, for example, there is one congressman to contact to help. The University of Texas matters to Lloyd Doggett and the 10th district. With about 50,000 students and tens of thousands more in faculty and staff, the UT community is a significant constituency of the 10th Congressional District. Republicans want to destroy our constituency and punish us because we vote Democratic. Anyway, here is Doggett's letter, a letter which we would not receive from a Democratic or Republican Congressman from McAllen, San Antonio or Houston (where Austin's representatives would likely live under GOP redistricting maps). Posted by Byron LaMasters at August 27, 2003 01:54 PM | TrackBack Comments
1. The Phil King map you link admits that "The map that King introduced in the current special session makes only minor changes in the 10th District", then goes on to claim that "A substitute could be made at any time, such as during a House-Senate conference committee. This may be a ruse to throw us off guard". This is a source? 2. The Staples map by no means stretched any Travis County district down to the Valley. See PLANC01151. This is the map your man Barrientos could have obtained for you had he not run off to New Mexico. Now he will be coming back to lord knows what map. So much for his service to you, his constituent. Posted by: Mark Harden at August 27, 2003 04:52 PMHang on, PLANC01151 is the CURRENT map. You want, from that link, to click on "All Other Redistricting Plans," then on PLAN O1268C for the version passed by the House twice. Which just reinforces my point, as the 01268C map is eerily similar to the current map and certainly does not spread to the Valley. King's map, PLAN01171C, does indeed spread from Austin to McAllen, probably to account for minority rights under the Voting Rights Act - but this map has never been seriously considered by anyone except alarmists hoping to foment opposition to redistricting. In any event, it would more likely result in a Congressman from AUSTIN imposed on McAllen than vice versa, would it not? McAllen, San Antonio or Houston (where Austin's representatives would likely live under GOP redistricting maps) If you ignore the propaganda site linked here, and instead refer to the Official Maps of the Texas Legislature, you will see that Austin would share absolutely no part of any districts with ANY of these three cities. Have you yourself looked at the official proposed maps yet? They didn't make them publicly available for nothing. Posted by: Mark Harden at August 27, 2003 05:02 PMMark, you're right about the House map. It kept the 10th in tact. The map that passed the Senate committee did divide Austin into several districts... I'll look it up for you if you'd like... I'm about to head out right now. The point, though, isn't about this map does this to Austin and this map does that to Austin. Every single map proposed by the GOP has destroyed communities of interest, whether it be in East Texas, West Texas, Central Texas, Austin, suburban/rural, etc. The fact that some maps screw Austin, and others leave it in tact only reinforces my point that the proposed Redistricting destroys communities of interest in multiple cases - I was simply pointing to one of them. Posted by: ByronUT at August 27, 2003 05:54 PMPost a comment
|
|