Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





August 04, 2003

Texas A&M = Hotbed of Liberalism?

By Byron LaMasters

I never thought so. But apparently one Dallas Morning News reader does.

Re: "A&M let me down," by P. Marcus White, Letters, July 21. Mr. White, a journalism undergraduate at Texas A&M, decries the disbanding of the journalism department. He asks, "Can someone explain to me why I feel left out in the cold?"

While I cannot speak for this fine university, it is fair to say that the profession of journalism was once based on academic principles that include a firm regard for objectivity, aiming to present a balance of views so as to let the informed reader decide one's position on an issue. Gradually, the press has transformed from a respected profession into a political arm of the Democratic Party, bristling with rhetoric that advances a liberal "progressivism" rather than the profession of journalism.

Rather than weighing the contrasting sides of an issue, one side often is presented as the sole facts and the humanity of the opposing side is questioned, implicitly or explicitly (argumentum ad hominem).

Marcus asks why he feels out in the cold? His desired profession has migrated away from the fires of academic rigor toward the outlands of a civilized society where the might of the pen seeks to bully or manipulate rather than to inform.

A&M didn't abandon journalism. Journalism has abandoned the academic principles that are requisite for membership in academic community.

I applaud A&M for its exemplary upholding of the standards of academics and its quiet dissociation from a falling profession.

Robert Irvin, Fort Worth


Ok. Am I stupid or something? Or has Texas A&M been churning out liberals? With the exception of Mike, I really don't think that their journalism department has done too much for the Democratic Party.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at August 4, 2003 04:54 PM | TrackBack

Comments

"Rather than weighing the contrasting sides of an issue, one side often is presented as the sole facts and the humanity of the opposing side is questioned, implicitly or explicitly"

Sounds to me like Mr. Irvin is referring to Fox News.

Posted by: Mike Thomas at August 4, 2003 05:20 PM

I have to disagree, as a student of journalism, with the entire premise of the letter.

Most liberal arts have abandoned (or at least acknowledged the weakness of) the classical notion of objectivity which Mr. Irvin claims is supposed to be at the core of academics. That is that there is one story that is supposed to get reported one way.

The consensus now is that the "true" news is a construction. Sort of like the parable about the blind men and the elephant, you can only get at it by pulling together lots of different news sources. Reporters still have ethics; the fundamental ethic is to accurately state what they have found to be true. Good reporters still get different sides of the story. Much the same way that intellectually honest academics admit the problems with their own arguments. But reporters and academics both start out trying to make a point and if they are honest, they should admit that.

Of course, the "fair and balanced" people never did that and don't do that. They know who they are. Incidentally so does the author of the previous comment. :-p

Power likes to make itself invisible so it can't be confronted.

Incidentally, I find it sad that conservatives can only whine about the media these days. They don't have a leg to stand on, and haven't in a long, long, time.

To play the devils advocate though (and its about damned time someone said this I think), it's pretty pathetic for anyone to complain about the media being hopelessly "biased" agaist them. Really, now, do you want to let the world know that all the smart, sociable people think you're in the wrong?

People like Mr. Irvin ought to stop blaming the media for their problems (or worse, create flak-factories like "Accuracy" in Media and pseudoacademic thinktanks like Heritage to colonize what they can't control) and start blaming their own dipstick leaders and antiquated ideas. People who hold grudges against the media usually do that, in my experience, because the newsfolk are actually doing their job.

That applies equally to both sides.

Of course, now that the media wars have reached full pitch, we "resistance" liberals have no choice but to counterattack...

In the words of Rodney King, "can't we just all get along?"

Posted by: Jim D at August 4, 2003 05:47 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








March 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15