Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





August 01, 2003

Lubbock ISD Uses Pedophilia Defense

By Byron LaMasters

This is nuts.

The Lubbock Independent School District is using two main arguments to defend itself against a lawsuit filed by a gay student organization. One, the district's long-standing abstinence policy. And two, the crime of child sex.

The LISD filed a response to the lawsuit in federal court. The gay student organization says it's fighting for equal rights.

This all dates back to last fall when the organization asked Lubbock High if it could post flyers and make announcements over the PA about its meetings. Their request was denied by the principal, then the assistant superintendent and finally the school board.

Then, earlier this month, a New York based law firm representing the gay student group took the issue to federal court.

The lawsuit claims the LISD violated the Equal Rights Act, which bars discrimination against any group based on their viewpoints. This week, the LISD responded by stating, '...LISD has adopted a longstanding abstinence policy applying to all matters concerning sexual activity. ...Furthermore, of extreme significance, it is a criminal offense (Texas Penal Code 21.11) for children of the same sex under the age of 17 to have sexual contact, no matter the age difference.'

[...]

This lawsuit boarders on groundbreaking territory. It's the first of its kind in Texas. Similar suits were filed in California and Utah. In both of those cases, the gay organizations won.


The far right never ceases to amaze me in their zeal to deny people equal rights.

Oh, and there's a reason why I don't edit my comments. I feel that the far-right wing nuts (not the mostly sane but slightly misguided righties that post here frequently) say much more about themselves than I ever could with my thoughts. Here is Exhibit A from today's comments:


kill all the fuckin faggots

Posted by Dimplecrap at August 1, 2003 03:20 PM


Ok, Dimplecrap, I'll certainly give that all the consideration that it deserves.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at August 1, 2003 07:31 PM | TrackBack

Comments

And is there a similar Texas statute denying all different-sex activity under age 17, regardless of the age difference between the involved individuals?

I thought not.

Obviously, this law has the same problem as the Kansas statute SCOTUS told THEM to rethink.

Posted by: precinct1233 at August 2, 2003 08:32 AM

Great response on this Byron.

Posted by: J.R. Huff Jr, at August 29, 2003 12:36 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








March 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15