Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
August 01, 2003An Early Look at the U.S. SenateBy Byron LaMastersWhile I usually don't look to the National Review for a fair and balanced overview of politics, they did manage to produce a decent overview of the senate races from 15 months out. I think that the conventional wisdom is that the GOP has the upper-hand on paper, as more Democratic seats are in play. Still, suggesting that 12 Democratic seats are vulnerable to some degree is a bit of a stretch. Even so, it's worth taking a look. Here's their analysis and my comments on each race.
Fair enough. Even with Knowles, Alaska is a tough state. If the race is Knowles vs. Murkowski, I'd call it a toss-up. If it's Knowles vs. someone that beats Murkowski in the GOP primary, I'd give Knowles a slight edge.
This is a stretch. Huckabee might make it competetive, but Lincoln is popular and has little to worry about.
Another stretch. Republicans always target Boxer and they never come close to knocking her off. Anyway, I don't see how Davis's unpopularity can really hurt Boxer too much.
I think that Graham will drop out well before the filing deadline in Florida, but I'm not sure if he'll run again. I'd love to see Alex Penelas run if Graham doesn't. Closet case Mark Foley will never win a GOP primary.
Agreed. I think that Democrats could make it competetive with Jim Marshall. I'd love to see Shirley Franklin run, but I doubt that she could win (although it would energize the Black vote to the extent where it could help us pick up a congressional seat or two).
This seat is clearly the most likely Democratic pickup. I'd be happy with most of the Dems running, although my personal favorite is Barak Obama. Archpundit has all the latest.
Republicans have never won a Senate race in Louisiana. I'd be surprised if Breaux retires, but if he does I'm sure that a group of University Democrats will be there in December 2004 to help push the Democrat towards victory.
This should be a competetive race. I think that if Farmer can get lots of EMILY's List money and is able to portray Bond as tired and lazy (much like Maria Cantwell and Debbie Stabenow did to their opponents in 2000), then Farmer might squeak by. It still leans Republican at this point, however.
Fair analysis.
I still think that Edwards will win re-election pretty easily (maybe under 55%, but he'll win). His seat, however, is jinxed. Still, I think it's quite premature to write his senate obituary.
This is another GOP stretch. Dorgan's very popular in North Dakota, and despite White House preasure, Shaeffer has said that he's not interested repeatedly.
Next time there's an OK open seat, Brad Carson will run and make things competetive, but Nickles is safe as long as he wants the seat.
I'm certainly looking forward to a bloodbath in the GOP primary. Specter will win the primary, but he could be vulnerable in November if the primary is sufficiantly bloody.
Hollings will probably hold on if he runs again. Otherwise, the seat is right up there with Georgia in terms of Democratic vulnerability.
Another stretch. Thune's chance was last year against Johnson. If he couldn't beat Johnson, he won't beat Daschle. And now Daschle has a blog, so clearly, he can't lose now.
Murray has two solid victories under her belt. Dunn would have given her a run, but Nethercutt won't be able to compete with Murray in the western part of the state and the suburbs where votes needed for a Republican to win in Washington are. Just because he beat Tom Foley doesn't mean he can walk on water.
Another stretch. But this race could become competetive. Feingold always runs close races, so it could become a race. So Ohio won't be competetive? C'mon! We got Jerry! I'm more surprised that KY (Bunning) and CO (Campbell) are not even on the radar screen. Do I expect Democrats to pick up either? Not really, but I think that both could become competetive, especially if Campbell retires. Posted by Byron LaMasters at August 1, 2003 02:06 AM | TrackBackComments
Fair analysis Byron. I think Georgia could be won, but its tough. I'd prefer AG Thurber Baker or Labor Commish Mike Thurmond, both african-americans, who have won statewide in 2002. I'm hearing Ambassador Andrew Young may run. Rep. Marshall I think is leaning towards relection. Isakson may win only because he's from Gwinnett county over Collins. Watch out for Herman Cain. Don't think Isakson has much appeal to South Georgians. This will be another tough cycle for the Dems. Posted by: pc at August 1, 2003 12:08 PMThe Texas add looks completely unprofessional, as did the earlier ad. Dean looks wooden and unprepared. Please get some professional help in staging, framing and presenting. And going up against Bush without an American flag at least waving in the background is a mistake. The cost of producing the ad is minimal compared to the cost of running it. Come on Trippi, let's get with it. ingrid wiegand Posted by: ingrid wiegand at August 4, 2003 08:25 AMPost a comment
|
|