Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
July 30, 2003Gay Math? A Different ViewBy Byron LaMastersThere's been some fuss in the past couple of days about the gay public high school opening in New York. To be honest, I'm a little uneasy about it. Not that I have a problem with the concept of a gay high school. I think that for some students, a high school for gays and lesbians is the best option. I strongly support the Walt Whitman Community School in Dallas. For some gay and lesbian students, harassment is so severe, and the ridicule from classmates is so harsh, that the best option is to go to an alternative school. I think that we all know that middle school / junior high students that are openly gay or are perceived by their peers to be gay face a lot of harassment. My friend Chris blogged on this earlier:
I really know where Chris is coming from. I felt many of the same feelings at times in high school, although to a lesser extent. I have mixed feelings about my high school years, but in general, I don't regret attending the school in which I went to. My concern is with the fact that the school is public and taxpayer supported. I think that it sets up a dangerous precident. I strongly oppose private school vouchers, and if taxpayers can pay for a gay public high school, the arguement for private school vouchers becomes much easier (if those gays can use public money to promote their values, why can't money be spend to promote Christian values...). I think that the money would be more wisely spent on counseling programs for gays and lesbians in all New York public high schools. We should support sex education in all high schools that includes homosexuality. We should support efforts to include gay and lesbian contributions to literature and history into all high schools, not just one. Most importantly, we should help protect all gay and lesbian high school students by enacting anti-harassment laws and strongly enforcing them in all high schools. Public money should be spent on ensuring the education and safety of all children and students in all high schools, rather than establishing a slippery slope arguement for advocates of "school choice". Posted by Byron LaMasters at July 30, 2003 01:18 AM | TrackBackComments
New York City already has magnate schools and charter schools. New York City also already has "school choice", inasmuch as any public school student can go to any other public school regardless of geography. Also, this is just the (still small) expansion of an existing program, rather than a new school created from whole cloth. I'd love to see this school made obsolete, but until all public schools can prevent such violence against gay students, it's inexcusable to make those gay students shoulder the burden of that public failure in the meantime. Posted by: phil at July 30, 2003 02:59 PMQuoting from a friend's LJ, "The new LGBT highschool in NY is not just a public institution. It turns out that it's gotten major grants from private sources, and the city is only providing partial funding. Just like they do for religious schools." Posted by: Lis at July 30, 2003 10:54 PMphil - I ought to clarify. I support "school choice" within a district so that students may take advantage of magnet schools, charter schools, etc. I just feel uneasy about the whole "gay school" idea for the reasons mentioned in my post. Posted by: ByronUT at July 31, 2003 02:59 AMHi. I'm not against what you're saying, and I'm not trying to be pugnacious. But if they are gay, why do they need couseling? That's what wrong with us. We think couseling might help them solve their sexuality problem , but it doesn't. The Romans embraced the idea of gay, why don't we. We base our government on the idea of the romans. First there was the "white man's bible" which stated that blacks should be slave and should not learn how to read or write. Sorry if I'm exaggerating, but it demonstrated that we are keeping the gay from expressing them self and keep them in hiding. Posted by: Marshall at October 11, 2003 11:23 PMPost a comment
|
|