Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





July 30, 2003

Gay Math? A Different View

By Byron LaMasters

There's been some fuss in the past couple of days about the gay public high school opening in New York. To be honest, I'm a little uneasy about it. Not that I have a problem with the concept of a gay high school. I think that for some students, a high school for gays and lesbians is the best option. I strongly support the Walt Whitman Community School in Dallas. For some gay and lesbian students, harassment is so severe, and the ridicule from classmates is so harsh, that the best option is to go to an alternative school. I think that we all know that middle school / junior high students that are openly gay or are perceived by their peers to be gay face a lot of harassment. My friend Chris blogged on this earlier:

Being a gay student in public high school was the hardest thing that I’ve ever done. While most of you were worried about what to wear, I was worried how severe the physical harassment would be that day. Harassment was a daily challenge. I heard some form of the word “fag” hurled at me at least 10 times every day. While some of you got in trouble for holding hands with your significant other in the hallway, I yearned to have a significant other. Even if I was attracted to someone, how would I know their sexuality? No one was out in my high school. I have never had a boyfriend. I didn’t know innocent, light-hearted, puppy love. I didn’t go to my senior prom. I couldn’t give blood in the blood drive. I was frowned upon for using the words “gay” and “lesbian” as though they were profane. I feared for my life on several occasions including graduation. If I would have had the opportunity to attend the Harvey Milk High School, I would have done so. If I wanted to date someone, I'd only have to worry about someone being attracted to me, not my gender. The HMHS senior prom would not have forbidden same sex dates. “Gay” and “lesbian” would be part of daily speech. No one would be harassed for their sexuality.

I really know where Chris is coming from. I felt many of the same feelings at times in high school, although to a lesser extent. I have mixed feelings about my high school years, but in general, I don't regret attending the school in which I went to.

My concern is with the fact that the school is public and taxpayer supported. I think that it sets up a dangerous precident. I strongly oppose private school vouchers, and if taxpayers can pay for a gay public high school, the arguement for private school vouchers becomes much easier (if those gays can use public money to promote their values, why can't money be spend to promote Christian values...). I think that the money would be more wisely spent on counseling programs for gays and lesbians in all New York public high schools. We should support sex education in all high schools that includes homosexuality. We should support efforts to include gay and lesbian contributions to literature and history into all high schools, not just one. Most importantly, we should help protect all gay and lesbian high school students by enacting anti-harassment laws and strongly enforcing them in all high schools. Public money should be spent on ensuring the education and safety of all children and students in all high schools, rather than establishing a slippery slope arguement for advocates of "school choice".

Posted by Byron LaMasters at July 30, 2003 01:18 AM | TrackBack

Comments

New York City already has magnate schools and charter schools. New York City also already has "school choice", inasmuch as any public school student can go to any other public school regardless of geography. Also, this is just the (still small) expansion of an existing program, rather than a new school created from whole cloth.

I'd love to see this school made obsolete, but until all public schools can prevent such violence against gay students, it's inexcusable to make those gay students shoulder the burden of that public failure in the meantime.

Posted by: phil at July 30, 2003 02:59 PM

Quoting from a friend's LJ, "The new LGBT highschool in NY is not just a public institution. It turns out that it's gotten major grants from private sources, and the city is only providing partial funding. Just like they do for religious schools."

Posted by: Lis at July 30, 2003 10:54 PM

phil - I ought to clarify. I support "school choice" within a district so that students may take advantage of magnet schools, charter schools, etc. I just feel uneasy about the whole "gay school" idea for the reasons mentioned in my post.

Posted by: ByronUT at July 31, 2003 02:59 AM

Hi. I'm not against what you're saying, and I'm not trying to be pugnacious. But if they are gay, why do they need couseling? That's what wrong with us. We think couseling might help them solve their sexuality problem , but it doesn't. The Romans embraced the idea of gay, why don't we. We base our government on the idea of the romans. First there was the "white man's bible" which stated that blacks should be slave and should not learn how to read or write. Sorry if I'm exaggerating, but it demonstrated that we are keeping the gay from expressing them self and keep them in hiding.

Posted by: Marshall at October 11, 2003 11:23 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








June 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15